|A moment in time|
Wait! That wasn't subtle at all.
No, you're right. Subtle can be over-rated. My need for people to click on the ads is not subtle either. I spend hours upon hours researching and writing some of these posts, yet the only compensation I receive is from the advertising...and only if you click on those adverts. If you liked something you've read here, why not help a blogger out?
Take a closer look at that column of ads over there on the right? Choose something that sounds interesting (but it doesn't have to be interesting). Then click on it. That's it!!! While it costs you nothing, dear reader, each click sends a few pennies (and I do mean "few") my way. I bet that every time you click on one of those adverts, you will feel better. Go ahead, try it! See? Now try it again. Feel even better, doncha? It works every time.
|A moment in time on the The Aunty Em Ericann Blog|
It probaly didn't hurt that The Rolling Stones celebrated their 50th Anniversary since I posted the Brian Jones appreciation. Most people arrived at the Aunty Em Ericann Blog through a Google search. I wonder if yesterday's birthday of Mick Jagger will boost the latest numbers.
NUMBER 6 WITH A BULLET: It's also gratifying to see my Coconut Grove series rising in popularity, especially the post Unpacking Coconut Grove ► Part Two ► E.W.F. Stirrup House. This is the article in which I lay out the history of Ebenezer Woodbury Franklin Stirrup and why his house and legacy should be saved. I would be gratified if you will pass this along to people who are interested in historical preservation.
Stay tuned for Part Three of this series. In the next installment, which is almost complete, I will expose who controls which properties surrounding the E.W.F. Stirrup House and who is responsible for the Demolition by Neglect that the house is currently undergoing. This could get very ugly, especially since there are millions of developers' dollars at stake.
|James Rosen of Fox "News" who|
wrote "The Strong Man." his and
cover-up of John Mitchell
When Rosen wrote his John Mitchell apologia, his anonymous source could be assured that (s)he could lie with impunity about whether Anna Channault was telling the truth. However, subsequent releases of information about the 1968 presidential election, years before Watergate, proved that what Channault said was THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH.
This might be considered by some to be arcane, academic knowledge not worth revisiting at this point, some 44 years, or 11 presidential elections, after the one that put Richard Nixon in office. However, TREASON is never an academic issue and that's what Rosen's secret source is covering up by lying about Anna Chanault.
The million dollar question needs to be asked: Who could possibly be still around from those bygone days still interested in covering up Richard Nixon's TREASON? Rosen knows who it was and, by now, must know he printed an untruth told to him by his anonymous source.
I have my suspicions on who the source was. A few more interviews and I will be able to announce it as a fact. I am even willing to listen to what James Rosen might have to say, but he'd rather block me on Twitter than answer my uncomfortable questions about his book.
Italy? I don't even speak the language.
Meanwhile, feel free to poke around on my blog, leave some comments, call me names, whatever meets your fancy. However, don't forget to click on one of those adverts. Pretty please with sugar on top!