HEY YOU! YES, YOU!!

HEY YOU! YES, YOU!!


However you may have arrived here, this is the old Not Not Silly Newsroom.

It's a long story -- hardly worth going into here -- but after this place was declared a Brownfield Site, we abandoned it for the NEW! IMPROVED!! Not Now Silly Newsroom.

Feel free to stay and read what you came here to read, but when it's time to leave go to the new place by clicking HERE.

Monday, December 31, 2012

Judge Not 11 ► Missing Inaction At Year's End

Judge Nap says: "I want YOU to
repeat Libertarian nonsense without
thinking. Just like me."
As the year Twenty-Twelve comes to an end, Judge Andy, aka The Laughing Libertarian, has been almost missing in action. 

For the entire week (despite being extra vigilant because they knew Santa Claus was watching) the Judge Not Research Team™ only managed to collect 10 items from Judge Nap for the entire week. Consequently, I fired the whole lot of them. There's no reason I can't train a child to do this.

Judge Nap had been so prolific when I started this weekly series. He was sending out well over 100 items per week, more than all his other Fox "News" colleagues put together. However, his output has been dwindling from week to week until, for the final Judge Not of the year, I am left with just 10 items to remark upon.


At this rate, I won't have anything from Judge Nap to print in a few weeks. Sadly, if that were to happen, I would no longer be featured in the Lost Liberty & Freedom Today blog, which honoured me again this week.

Without any further delay, let's get right to this week's Judge Andy snark:

Why a publication dedicated to lionizing Judge Andy promotes my snarky posts is something I don't understand. However, I'll take it as it's good for my hit-counter. Thanks!
This is part of the gun problem in 'Merka. Now that there is public pressure to do something, ANYTHING, about gun violence in the country, some people are going to cling to their guns and religion. No matter what laws exist, there are always going to be people who will ignore the law, or find a work-a-round, no matter what.


HAW!!! HAW!!! HAW!!! HAW!!!

It's amusing how Libertarians will quote Libertarian hero Penn Jillette when it's convenient. However, Penn has also come out strongly against religion (something Judge Nap has embraced and has talked about being a proud pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic) and the Fox "News" Phony War on Christmas (something else Judge Nap supports).

This, Judge Nap, is what I mean by you passing along stupid shit without really thinking it through. Help me reason this out.

Should there be guns in school hallways in locked boxes with IN CASE OF EMERGENCY BREAK GLASS signs above them? It's surprising to see Libertarians think more guns is the answer to too many guns in our society. This graphic seems to indicate Libertarians don't want armed and qualified police officers in the schools -- because that would be Big Government and just one step away from a New World Order, doncha know? They just want guns in the schools.

Therefore, the question needs to be asked, Judge Nap, who would wield them? I say we equip Newt Gingrinch's proposed student janitorial staff. Whaddaya say, Judge Andy? You with me?

TRANSLATION: When law-breakers are outlawed, only outlaws will be law-breakers.

While the drone program troubles me, you've never answered my question: What would YOU do under the same circumstances?

No more, or less, disgusting than some of the things you've come up with, Judge Nap.

A word of caution for those among my readers who still cling to their guns and religion: This is not a How-To guide.

Tacitus also said, "They have plundered the world, stripping naked the land in their hunger… they are driven by greed, if their enemy be rich; by ambition, if poor… They ravage, they slaughter, they seize by false pretenses, and all of this they hail as the construction of empire. And when in their wake nothing remains but a desert, they call that peace."

HAW!!! HAW!!! HAW!!! HAW!!!

Here's the deal, Judge Nap: At least Liberal Democrats have brains. A Liberal Democrat is less likely to pick up Right Wing/GOP/Teabagger/Fox "News" Talking Points and repeat them without thinking. Like you do. [See above, or previous Judge Not posts for many examples.] Liberal Democrats, as several studies have determined, are more likely to look at several sources of information before making up their minds about an issue. This is in direct opposition to believing the first thing Fox "News" falsely tells its brain-dead viewers. Liberal Democrats don't listen to radio (or watch tee vee) to bolster a narrow world view, as listeners of Right Wing Radio do. That's the principle reason why Air America was unable to survive and why Fox "News" does so well. Its audience doesn't want to be challenged. The Fox "News" audience is looking for validation.

Judge Nap, despite his professed Libertarian leanings, is happy to give them that validation. No doubt he will continue to unthinkingly pass along so-called Libertarian silliness to his brain-dead followers well into the New Year. Which is why there will always be room on my blog for Judge Not, a snarky series on the Laughable Libertarian Logic™ emanating from the Fox "News" Senior Judicial Correspondent Judge Andrew Napolitano.

Happy New Year, Judge Nap!!!