|Judge Andy in unretouched pic |
taken directly from my tee vee screen
While it's clearly against the Aunty Em Ericann blog employee rules, all the Judge Not unpaid interns took a long, liquid lunch at the same time (leaving the phones to ring off the hook) to argue and speculate how long it would be before The Laughing Libertarian was back to messaging. More importantly, they organized an office pool on how long it would be before Judge Nap broached the issue of guns again. As it turned out, that happened the very next day with his second message. [I'd tell you who won the pool, but I don't think they plan to declare their winnings. Therefore, it's best if it remains an office secret. Besides,] I fired all the interns and hired new ones. I'll teach them to have a long, liquid lunch without me.
On a personal note: Last week's Judge Not blog post was promoted twice during the week on the Lost Liberty & Freedom Today blog. Thank you so much. It's quite an honour and I'll try not to disappoint our mutual, faithful readers.
Now, take it away Judge Andy:
|There are no innocent 'Merkins.|
|What do YOU think, Judge Nap? I wish you would enlighten us on your feelings, as opposed to passing along what others say to maintain a modicum of plausible deniability.|
|This is the first of my two appearances on the Lost Liberty & Freedom Today blog this week. It's a seminal honour to appear on this blog because the Lost Liberty and Freedom Today site is set up (apparently) by a Judge Andy Libertarian Lap Dog™.|
|Where do I sign up for my tin foil hat? I've read several articles about this and I have yet to find any credible sourcing. While I cannot say it's NOT true, it all has the feeling of Black Helicopters and FEMA Concentration Camps.|
|I can't tell whether Judge Andy thinks this was a good idea, or a bad one.|
|Here's another one for you to answer, Judge: Who in a position of power has actually advocated confiscating guns? You're just trying to stir up the emotions of your brain-dead followers.|
|Truth? That's rich, Judge Nap? You serve to mislead. However, feel free to tell my faithful readers the truth, Judge Nap: Who in the White House (which you've pictured wearing a turban? What the hell is that?) wants to ban guns?|
|Because the only answer to guns is more guns and what might work in Texas is perfectly applicable to Detroit or New York or any other place in 'Merka.|
|Izzat a good thing, or a bad thing, Judge Nap? Is Scientology a cult which needs investigating, or is it a government intrusion on freedom of religion?|
|It would be more accurate to say, "Your cellphone is capable of spying on you." However, that wouldn't play into Judge Nap's desire to make you afraid of your government.|
|What does this have to do with guns? You're slipping, Judge.|
|Yet, as long as it remains a Republic people can vote the leadership out. So, what's your point again?|
|See article below.|
|And, it's this kind of thoughtless defense of the Second Amendment that makes Judge Andy a Libertarian hero.|
|Judge, I have to ask again: Who has proposed a gun ban? Who is trying to take away your guns?|
Next year the Fox "News" Phony War on Christmas will be fought with assault rifles.